Subsection 1(1)
Convey
Administrative Policy
LTT-3 "Transfers Involving Corporations"
Where, by virtue of a statutory amalgamation, the land or lands of two or more companies become vested in the company resulting from the amalgamation, such conveyance of land is not interpreted by the Ministry of Finance as a conveyance of land within the meaning of section 1 of the Act and, as a result, no tax is payable on these transactions. Also, any unregistered transfers of land that result from a statutory amalgamation are not dispositions under section 3 of the Act.
Value of the Consideration
Cases
Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Minister of Revenue of Ontario, [1994] OJ No. 897
A wholly-owned subsidiary ("Realty") of the Toronto-Dominion Bank (the "Bank") was dissolved and in connection with that dissolution, Realty directed that land which it previously had owned in fee simple be conveyed to the Bank which, in turn, directed that legal title be held by Realty as bare trustee. Realty, the Bank and another wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank ("Penlim") agreed that thereafter the legal interest in the property would be transferred from Realty to Penlim to be held by Penlim as bare trustee for the Bank. The Bank applied to the Court for direction as to whether such transfer of legal title to the Bank would trigger land transfer tax under paragraph (f) of the definition of value of consideration.
Feldman J. found that "a person who owns land in fee simple holds the entire title and is prima facie not a trustee". Accordingly, the analysis of the Minister, that when Realty held the land in fee simple it held both the equitable and legal interest in the land, represented a strained interpretation of the definition, and should not be accepted. The transfer of the legal interest in the land to Penlim would not attract land transfer tax.
Re 472601 Ontario Ltd. and Minister of Revenue (1987), 59 OR (2d) 25 (HCJ)
The appellant entered into an agreement to purchase real property for a stipulated purchase price of approximately $7.0 million, with the purchase price being stated to include the provision of services by a third party pursuant to a separate services agreement which indicated that the value of such services was approximately $3.3 million. Given that the parties clearly specified that the value of the services was included in the consideration for the sale, such value was included in the "value of the consideration".
Re Assaly and Minister of Revenue (1986), 56 OR (2d) 30 (HCJ)
A corporation owned by the appellant entered into an agreement with him in 1981 to sell vacant land to him for a purchase price of $185,000 with the agreement of purchase and sale being conditional upon the appellant and the corporation entering into a building contract under which the corporation would construct condominium units on the land. The transfer was registered in 1983 after building work had been completed.
Although the gross sale price for the conveyance was $185,000, the building contract constituted "part of the arrangement relating to the conveyance" and by virtue of the building contract arrangement a liability was assumed by the appellant as part of that arrangement. McKinlay J. noted that the Oxford English Dictionary defined "arrangement" as "a structure or combination of things for a purpose". Consequently, the total "value of the consideration" was $2,142,700 (i.e., including such liability).
Subsection 2(1)
Administrative Policy
Partitioning of a Co-tenancy
Where a partitioning of land takes place and each or any of the "co-tenants" receives land equal in value to their original interest in the whole parcel, no tax will be payable. This applies where one parcel of land is partitioned, i.e. that the partitioned lands are contiguous. ...
Dissolution of a Partnership
...[P]artnerships are treated as tenancies in common for purposes of the tax. Where a dissolution of a partnership that owns land takes place and each or any of the partners receives land equal in value to their original interest in the whole parcel, no tax will be payable. This applies where one parcel of land is distributed among the partners, i.e. that the distributed lands are contiguous.
Forms
Subsection 2(6)
Administrative Policy
Bulletin LTT 6-2000 "Leases and the Land Transfer Tax Act" June 2000
Regulation 700, RRO 1990 provides ...[that] in the case of a surrender or notice of surrender of the rights of a lessee under a lease or a sublease to the person entitled to the reversion of such lease or sublease, when the term of that lease (including any renewals or extensions) can exceed 50 years, the consideration is reduced to the actual consideration passing (or to zero if there is no consideration passing).
Subsection 3(1)
Cases
Upper Valley Dodge Chrysler Ltd. v. Minister of Finance (2003), 67 OR (3d) 196 (Sup Ct J), aff'd (2005), 73 OR (3d) 146 (Sup Ct J Div Ct)
The transfer of land by an individual to a corporation which had been using the land in its car dealership business was an exempt transaction notwithstanding the requirement in s. 3(1) that prior to the transfer the land had been used "predominantly in the operation of an active business which was operated exclusively by an individual". Although prior to the transfer the business was owned by the corporation, that business was operated by the individual due to his effective control of the business. Furthermore, the word "individual" should be interpreted to include a corporation given that there is no relevant statutory definition of this term.
Administrative Policy
Forms
Paragraph 3(9)(c)
Administrative Policy
Land Transfer Tax and the Treatment of Unregistered Dispositions of a Beneficial Interest in Land May 2006
Clause (c) involves cases in which the beneficial interest in the land leaves the corporate circle of affiliated corporations and is acquired by a non-related third party. Provided the tax payable is paid on the acquisition by that third party, the corporation or corporations which had received a deferral may have their undertakings shortened and their deferred tax cancelled.
Forms
Paragraph 3(11)(a)
Cases
2143569 Ontario Inc. v. Minister of Revenue, 2014 ONSC 4628
A corporation holding both legal and beneficial ownership of an Ontario property ("Your Host") transferred registered title pursuant to a trust agreement with its parent ("McIntosh Holdings"). A week later (on 12 September 2007), Your Host transferred beneficial ownership to the appellant. The appellant then applied for deferral under ss. 3(9) and (11) of the LTTA. A year later, the City of Niagara Falls registered a development agreement on title, which recited that McIntosh Holdings held title on behalf of the appellant.
In rejecting the position of the Minister that cancellation of the deferred tax was not available by virtue of s. 3(9)(c) and 3(11)(a) because the development agreement was an instrument evidencing the disposition of the beneficial interest, Lofchik J stated (at para. 18):
Evidence of "the" disposition would at the very least have to identify the entity disposing of the property (Your Host) and the entity benefitting from the disposition (2143569 Ontario Ltd.). The recital… does not accomplish this.
Subsection 3(12)
Administrative Policy
Land Transfer Tax and the Treatment of Unregistered Dispositions of a Beneficial Interest in Land May 2006
A similar situation results without the assistance of subsection 3(12) in the case of corporations which amalgamate through statutory amalgamation. In the ministry's view, for land transfer tax purposes, the amalgamated corporation is a continuation of the corporations which have been amalgamated. As a result, the corporations which have been amalgamated, if they were affiliates immediately before and at the time of amalgamation, will always be affiliates following the amalgamation.
Commentary
The chart below provides a general comparison of the Ontario land transfer tax regime with that of the other nine provinces.
2% on excess
Mortgages: $50 plus $1.00 for each $1,000 of principal amount
$25 on excess to $8,400;
0.3% on excess
0.5% on next $60,000
1.0 % on next $60,000
1.5% on next $50,000
2.0% on excess over $200,000
Plus additional 0.5% tax on property with one or two family dwellings to extent the consideration exceeds $400,000
Exemptions for unregistered dispositions:
Plus an additional 0.5% on property with one or two family dwellings to extent the consideration exceeds $400,000 (or instead an additional 1.0% to the extent exceeding $40 million)
Exemptions for
No exemptions for transfers between related corporations
Mortgage: